English Typing Test

AFR CourtNo.-84 Case:-APPLICATIONU/S482No.-12300of2021 Applicant:-YasMohammad OppositeParty:-StateofU.P.andAnother CounselforApplicant:-RameshKumarChaurasia CounselforOppositeParty:-G.A. Hon'bleDr.YogendraKumarSrivastava,J. 1.HeardSriRameshKumarChaurasia,learnedcounselfortheapplicantandSriVinodKant,learnedAdditionalAdvocateGeneralappearingalongwithSriPankajSaxena,learnedAdditionalGovernmentAdvocate-IfortheState-oppositeparty. 2.ThepresentapplicationunderSection482oftheCodeofCriminalProcedure,19731hasbeenfiledwithaprayertoset-asidetheorderdated18.03.2021passedbyAdditionalSessionsJudge,F.T.C-1,BalliainCriminalRevisionNo.28of2021(YashMohammadVs.State),arisingoutoforderdated09.02.2021passedinCaseCrimeNo.360of2020underSections3/5-A/8ofTheUttarPradeshPreventionofCowSlaughterAct,19552andSection11ofThePreventionofCrueltytoAnimalAct,19603,PoliceStation-Bairiya,DistrictBallia. 3.ThepleadingsofthecaseindicatethatpursuanttoproceedingsinitiatedwithlodgingofanF.I.R.dated21.9.2020undersection3/5-A/8ofthePCSAandSection11ofthePCAAregisteredasCaseCrimeNo.360of2020atPoliceStation-Bairiya,District-Ballia,thevehiclestatedtobecarryingtheanimalswasseizedundersection5-AofthePCSA.Theapplicantclaimingtobetheownerofthevehicleinquestion,filedanapplicationbeforethecourtofACJM-I,Ballia,seekingreleaseofthevehicle.ThelearnedMagistrateupontakingintoconsiderationtheschemeoftheActandinparticular,sub-section(7)ofSection5-A,whichhasbeeninsertedbyU.P.ActNo.20of2020,rejectedtheapplication.Aggrieved,againsttheordertheapplicantpreferredarevisionbeingCriminalRevisionNo.28of2021(YashMohammadVs.State)andthelearnedAdditionalSessionsJudge/F.T.C.-1,BalliaheldthattherewasnoillegalityorirregularityintheorderpassedbytheMagistrateandaccordingly,dismissedtherevisionbyorderdated18.03.2021. 4.LearnedcounselfortheapplicanthassoughttoassailtheorderspassedbytherevisionalcourtandtheMagistratebyseekingtocontendthatsincethevehicleoftheapplicanthadbeenconfiscated,thecourtsbelowhavecommittedanerrorinrejectingtheapplicationforrelease,ignoringthepowersexercisableundersection451and457oftheCode.Hesubmitsthatthepropertyinquestioni.e.thevehiclewhichislyingwiththeauthoritiesisliabletobereleased.RelianceissoughttobeplacedonthejudgementinthecaseofSunderbhaiAmbalalDesaiv.StateofGujarat4 5.LearnedAdditionalGovernmentAdvocate-IhascontrovertedtheaforesaidcontentionbysubmittingthattheproceedingshavebeeninitiatedunderthePCSA,whichisaSpecialAct,andprovidesaseparateprocedurewithregardtoconfiscationandseizureunderSection5-Athereof,andinviewoftheprovisionscontainedunderSection5oftheCode,thepowersunderSections451to457relatingtodisposalofpropertywouldnotbeapplicable.Accordingly,hesubmitsthattheorderspassedbytheMagistrateandtherevisionalcourtcannotbesaidtobefaultedwith. 6.InordertoappreciatetherivalcontentionstheprovisionsascontainedunderSections5,451,452and457oftheCodemaybeadvertedto,andthesameareasunder:- "5.Saving.-NothingcontainedinthisCodeshall,intheabsenceofaspecificprovisiontothecontrary,affectanyspecialorlocallawforthetimebeinginforce,oranyspecialjurisdictionorpowerconferred,oranyspecialformof
0:00